Ranked by what you actually keep
These bots are ordered by annual return divided by the deepest fall it took to earn it — not by return alone. A bot that makes 70% a year while dropping a third of your account ranks below one that makes 37% while dropping a tenth, because the second is the one you can actually hold on to.
| # | Bot | Equity | Annual return | Max DD | Return ÷ DD | PF after fees | PF before fees | Win rate | 7d | 30d | 90d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SOL · Flash · 59 minutes | +37.3% | 12.3% | 3.02 | 1.24 | 1.34 | 54.5% | +3.6% | +8.0% | +17.5% | Copy bot | |
| 3 | SOL · Trend · 1 hour | +35.5% | 14.8% | 2.39 | 1.44 | 1.54 | 60.9% | -0.7% | +4.8% | +0.4% | Copy bot | |
| 8 | SOL Trigger WDBest for SOL SOL · Trigger · 30 minutes | +22.1% | 25.2% | 0.88 | 1.10 | 1.16 | 48.5% | -0.7% | +13.5% | +37.5% | Copy bot |
How to read this. Annual return is the compound yearly rate over the backtest, each position sized off the same $10,000 base. Max drawdown is the deepest peak-to-trough fall — on a $1,000 allocation, a 30% drawdown means watching $300 disappear before it recovers. Return ÷ DD is the ranking column: above 2.0 is strong, below 1.0 means a user endures more pain than profit. Profit factor is shown twice, after and before fees; the gap is what trading the bot costs. All figures are backtested, so treat them as a ceiling — live fills and slippage make real results lower.