Ranked by what you actually keep
These bots are ordered by annual return divided by the deepest fall it took to earn it — not by return alone. A bot that makes 70% a year while dropping a third of your account ranks below one that makes 37% while dropping a tenth, because the second is the one you can actually hold on to.
| # | Bot | Equity | Annual return | Max DD | Return ÷ DD | PF after fees | PF before fees | Win rate | 7d | 30d | 90d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | ETH · Reversal · 45 minutes | +24.1% | 11.7% | 2.06 | 1.41 | 1.56 | 47.0% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +13.9% | Copy bot | |
| 9 | ETH 30M ASHI 55% WDBest for ETH ETH · Heiken-Ashi · 30 minutes | +19.4% | 23.0% | 0.84 | 1.12 | 1.22 | 53.2% | +1.7% | -9.3% | -11.6% | Copy bot |
How to read this. Annual return is the compound yearly rate over the backtest, each position sized off the same $10,000 base. Max drawdown is the deepest peak-to-trough fall — on a $1,000 allocation, a 30% drawdown means watching $300 disappear before it recovers. Return ÷ DD is the ranking column: above 2.0 is strong, below 1.0 means a user endures more pain than profit. Profit factor is shown twice, after and before fees; the gap is what trading the bot costs. All figures are backtested, so treat them as a ceiling — live fills and slippage make real results lower.